Program overview
About Old Partners
Old Partners — Current programme. Current research covers Revenue Share 40%-50% with an introductory rate up to 70%; CPA up to $200; Every two months in current AFFCatalog; $10 minimum; Negative balance reset; In-house; 30-day cookie reported; plus GEO, traffic-source and brand rules. Reviewed 26 September 2026 using Current Old Partners site and AFFCatalog record updated 9 March 2026.
Old Partners research profile
Old Partners is reviewed here as current programme. The research basis is Current Old Partners site and AFFCatalog record updated 9 March 2026. The commercial position currently associated with the programme is Revenue Share 40%-50% with an introductory rate up to 70%; CPA up to $200; payout information is Every two months in current AFFCatalog; $10 minimum; balance treatment is Negative balance reset; and tracking is described as In-house; 30-day cookie reported. The programme is associated with Gold Casino and primarily covers Casino / iGaming. Current public data reports a very low $10 threshold but a comparatively slow two-month payout cycle. An introductory 70% Revenue Share rate is reported for the first three weeks, after which the standard 40%-50% structure applies. This review separates directly documented facts from directory-reported or historical information so publishers can distinguish a usable current offer from an archival listing. Where the public record is incomplete or contradictory, the practical requirement is written confirmation before traffic is sent or spend is increased.
| Field | Current finding |
|---|---|
| Status | Current programme |
| Commission | Revenue Share 40%-50% with an introductory rate up to 70%; CPA up to $200 |
| Payout | Every two months in current AFFCatalog; $10 minimum |
| Balance | Negative balance reset |
| Tracking | In-house; 30-day cookie reported |
| Markets | Bangladesh, Brazil, India and Mexico are current target GEOs |
| Brands | Gold Casino |
Old Partners status and source quality
The first due-diligence question is whether this listing is commercially actionable today. The status is Current programme. Because the programme appears current, a publisher should still confirm that applications are open, the intended brand accepts the proposed GEO and the account is assigned the same commercial plan described in public material. The source set used here is Current Old Partners site and AFFCatalog record updated 9 March 2026. A functioning website or directory status is evidence of infrastructure, but it does not prove that every country, traffic source or legacy deal remains accepted. Save the dated terms and manager approval that actually govern the account.
Old Partners commission structure and earnings model
The documented commission position is Revenue Share 40%-50% with an introductory rate up to 70%; CPA up to $200. The available or reported commercial models are Revenue Share, CPA. For Revenue Share, the important comparison is not merely the top headline percentage but the effective share after tier rules and deductions. For CPA, the qualifying event must be defined with the same precision: minimum deposit, wagering, fraud checks, duplicate-account logic, chargeback treatment, validation window and any campaign cap. Hybrid structures combine those risks and should be modelled as two separate cash flows. For Old Partners, use the public figure as a benchmark only; the rate visible in the approved account, written IO or manager confirmation should be the number used for forecasting and paid-media decisions.
Old Partners NGR deductions and effective Revenue Share
A nominal Revenue Share of 40%-50% standard; up to 70% introductory can produce very different cash outcomes depending on the NGR definition. Ask Old Partners to state every deduction before the percentage is applied: bonuses, free bets, chargebacks, payment costs, taxes, game-provider royalties, progressive jackpot contributions, licensing costs, fraud adjustments, returned stakes and administrative fees. The current research note is: Current public data reports a very low $10 threshold but a comparatively slow two-month payout cycle. An introductory 70% Revenue Share rate is reported for the first three weeks, after which the standard 40%-50% structure applies. A useful test is to take a sample month of gross player revenue, subtract the published deductions line by line, apply the assigned tier and compare the result with the dashboard commission. That reconciliation exposes whether the programme behaves like the headline rate or whether structural deductions materially reduce effective earnings.
Old Partners payout timing, threshold and payment operations
The payout snapshot is Every two months in current AFFCatalog; $10 minimum. Reported or published payment methods are Bank transfer, Bitcoin, USDT, Ethereum, Litecoin, Revolut and PayPal reported. Publishers should distinguish accounting close, validation, invoice submission, payment approval and actual receipt, because each can create a different delay. Confirm supported currencies, KYC requirements, who bears bank or network fees, what happens below the threshold and whether dormant balances expire. If crypto is offered, record the exact asset and chain. If bank transfer is used, ask whether intermediary fees or currency conversion are deducted. The first two settlements from Old Partners should be reconciled against the dashboard so the expected cadence becomes evidence-based rather than assumed from a marketing page.
Old Partners negative balance, carry-over and volatility
The current balance position is: Negative balance reset. That rule can materially change lifetime value for affiliates with small cohorts or high-value players. A carry-over means a large winning month may absorb future positive NGR before commission becomes payable; a reset limits that exposure but can still contain exceptions for fraud, chargebacks or high rollers. When public sources conflict, as they sometimes do for mature programmes, request the exact clause in the account terms and keep a copy. Stress-test Old Partners with one large player win, one reversed deposit and one fraud adjustment. The objective is to understand how much future commission could be delayed or offset before spending money to acquire more players.
Old Partners tracking, attribution and reporting
Tracking is currently described as In-house; 30-day cookie reported. Before scale, send a controlled test through the exact link and landing page planned for production. Record the click, registration, first deposit or qualifying event, and then verify that revenue appears in the correct campaign or sub-ID. Ask whether attribution is first-click or last-click, how long the cookie or session persists, whether promo codes can recover attribution, and how cross-device journeys are handled. Media buyers should also ask for postbacks or API access. Detailed day-, GEO-, campaign- and player-level reporting makes it much easier to distinguish traffic-quality problems from tracking failures or changes in operator economics.
Old Partners GEOs, licensing and market fit
The current market picture is Bangladesh, Brazil, India and Mexico are current target GEOs. A country appearing on a target list does not automatically make every advertisement lawful or every traffic source acceptable. Confirm the operator entity and licence serving the player, minimum age, local gambling-advertising rules, required responsible-gambling language and whether affiliates need a registration or permit. A single programme can operate different brands or domains under different licences, so the approval must identify the exact property being promoted. For Old Partners, keep a dated GEO matrix and update it when domains, licences or regulations change; this avoids leaving old localized pages live after the programme has withdrawn from a market.
Old Partners traffic-source and brand-bidding rules
The current traffic guidance is: Source approval required; country-specific campaign terms apply. Treat SEO, generic PPC, brand PPC, misspellings, paid social, creators, streaming, email, SMS, push, apps, in-app inventory, ASO and sub-networks as separate permissions. A programme may accept one while prohibiting another, and an informal manager comment may not override formal terms. For higher-risk paid channels, retain written approval that specifies brand, country, source and creative. This is particularly important when the programme can withhold commission for prohibited traffic. If Old Partners changes ownership, platform or licence, refresh those approvals rather than assuming historic permissions survive the migration.
Old Partners brands, products and conversion fit
The current brand position is Gold Casino, with a product mix of Casino / iGaming. Brand fit can matter more than an extra few percentage points of commission: payment methods, localization, mobile experience, bonus design, sportsbook depth, game suppliers and retention all affect player lifetime value. Separate major brands or verticals with sub-IDs so blended reporting does not hide weak performance. Also confirm whether cross-sell is credited when a player joins through sportsbook and later generates casino revenue, or vice versa. If several brands sit in one affiliate wallet, ask whether negative results are bundled across them. Portfolio changes should trigger a new review of landing pages, licensing claims and commercial terms.
Old Partners sub-affiliate and referral economics
The current sub-affiliate position is Not publicly verified. Referral schemes differ materially: some pay a percentage of the referred affiliate’s commission, others a percentage of NGR, and some run only for a limited introductory period. Confirm the calculation base, duration, eligibility and whether the override survives a later change to the referred publisher’s deal. Also verify whether public recruitment or paid advertising for affiliate signups is allowed. Where Old Partners does not publish a complete schedule, any manager-offered referral rate should be stored beside the main agreement so it is not mistaken for a programme-wide standard.
Old Partners compliance and creative governance
Affiliate compliance should be treated as a campaign system rather than a one-time signup checkbox. Before publishing Old Partners content, verify bonus wording, age restrictions, responsible-gambling messaging, prohibited claims, use of logos and whether comparative statements need approval. Keep a dated library of banners and landing pages received from the programme. If a promotion changes, update the article or ad rather than leaving an expired offer live. For influencers or streamers, confirm disclosure requirements and audience-age rules. This record is valuable during payment disputes because it demonstrates that the traffic source and promotional method were disclosed and approved before the referred players were acquired.
Old Partners launch checklist and first-payment test
Before sending meaningful traffic, obtain one written launch brief covering the exact brand/domain, GEO, traffic source, commercial model, assigned rate, NGR or CPA qualification formula, balance treatment, attribution window, prohibited keywords, payment threshold, payout rail and dispute contact. Save the terms or IO that were in force on that date. Then run a small validation cohort. Check that a test registration and deposit appear correctly, and for Revenue Share reconcile at least one period from player value to NGR to commission. For CPA, compare every rejected conversion with the agreed qualification rule. Only after Old Partners passes both attribution and settlement checks should traffic or media spend be scaled.
Old Partners ongoing monitoring after launch
After launch, maintain a monthly ledger for Old Partners containing clicks, registrations, FTDs or qualifying conversions, gross player value, deductions, commission earned, withdrawals requested and cash received. Track changes in rate, threshold, platform, brand list and GEO permissions with effective dates instead of overwriting old values. Repeat a tracking test after any migration or major landing-page change. When the programme is archival or closed, the same ledger helps reconcile unpaid historic balances and identify whether a successor programme assumed liabilities. For a live programme, three months of cohort data is usually enough to separate conversion, qualification, retention, deduction and payout-timing effects and to judge the commercial mechanics on evidence rather than headline marketing.
Old Partners editorial conclusion
Old Partners is most usefully compared through documented mechanics rather than a single headline rate. The core snapshot is status: Current programme; commission: Revenue Share 40%-50% with an introductory rate up to 70%; CPA up to $200; settlement: Every two months in current AFFCatalog; $10 minimum; balance treatment: Negative balance reset; and tracking: In-house; 30-day cookie reported. For an active campaign, the next step is written confirmation that the public terms match the approved account, followed by a controlled tracking and first-payment test. This evidence-first approach keeps the review useful even when public directories lag behind private deal sheets or when operator terms change between markets.
Primary research source
Research source: Current Old Partners site and AFFCatalog record updated 9 March 2026. Commercial terms and programme status can change without notice; the current signed agreement and manager-confirmed campaign approval take precedence.